Publication: Reinforcing Labor Caselaw: Recent Decisions Concerning Union, Strike, FDC
| dc.contributor.author | Virak Prum | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-08T03:17:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | December 30, 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This review on recent decisions reveals the will of the Arbitration Council in defending its precedents in three key areas of labor law, namely, the so-called most representative status of a trade union, the arbitrators’ order to strikers to return to work, and the issue concerning the length of fixed duration contracts. The Council never hesitates to refuse to consider interest-based claims if the union lacks that particular status; it is also quick to discontinue its proceedings should employees disobey its order to stop the strike. Concerning the fixed duration contracts, the well-known “two years and that’s it!” position has not changed. The quickest conclusion is that the Arbitration Council will not change its positions any time soon. Keywords: Interest, most representative, strike, caselaw, FDC. | |
| dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.62458/021024-13 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://cam-ed-oar.com/handle/cam-ed-oar/616 | |
| dc.publisher | CamEd Business School | |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | |
| dc.title | Reinforcing Labor Caselaw: Recent Decisions Concerning Union, Strike, FDC | |
| dc.type | Peer-reviewed Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |