Publication:
Reinforcing Labor Caselaw: Recent Decisions Concerning Union, Strike, FDC

dc.contributor.authorVirak Prum
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-08T03:17:25Z
dc.date.issuedDecember 30, 2019
dc.description.abstractThis review on recent decisions reveals the will of the Arbitration Council in defending its precedents in three key areas of labor law, namely, the so-called most representative status of a trade union, the arbitrators’ order to strikers to return to work, and the issue concerning the length of fixed duration contracts. The Council never hesitates to refuse to consider interest-based claims if the union lacks that particular status; it is also quick to discontinue its proceedings should employees disobey its order to stop the strike. Concerning the fixed duration contracts, the well-known “two years and that’s it!” position has not changed. The quickest conclusion is that the Arbitration Council will not change its positions any time soon. Keywords: Interest, most representative, strike, caselaw, FDC.
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.62458/021024-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://cam-ed-oar.com/handle/cam-ed-oar/616
dc.publisherCamEd Business School
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleReinforcing Labor Caselaw: Recent Decisions Concerning Union, Strike, FDC
dc.typePeer-reviewed Article
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files